In comparison to civilian products of wide use, military-technical systems are a distinctive category of material commodities whose life is defined by a period of peace of a certain evolution. Following are three main points of the life cycle of a military product:
1. The introduction of the life cycle of a military product.
2. The concept of a military product’s life cycle.
3. The military approach to the life-cycle concept of a product.
The unique properties of military products, their exorbitant price, and their societal utility determine this particular progression of the life cycle. The necessity to cover the security needs that these reinvigorated technical systems can supply under an economically financially beneficial balance is essentially related to the "repeatability" of the life cycle to another beneficiary. These “spiral” lifecycles of military-oriented products are a variation that certain reputable material goods makers have adopted (from the luxury vehicle sector) with great economic results as much as feasible chosen for marketing reasons. Although this approach may not appear to be very advantageous at first glance, it can be a quick and beneficial solution for the second user who can benefit from the capabilities of a reliable and verified technical system that has been upgraded to the current level of global performance in the short and medium-term. This method is ideal for countries with a moderate economic power but significant security needs, such as those imposed by NATO membership, as well as the current complex geopolitical scenario.
Product Life Cycle (PLC) refers to a product's average lifespan and indicates the length of time a product/brand of a product spends on the market, beginning with its introduction and ending with its discontinuation (these two phases can be identified with ease). Many authors compare the concept to biology, where products are born, grow, develop, and eventually get older and die.
According to Rey, Martn-Gil, and Velasco (2004), there are two major conceptions about a product's life cycle. The first (and most common) claim is that a product has four stages in its life cycle:
1. release;
2. the growth;
3. maturity;
4. decline.
According to the American perspective of integrated logistics support for military-technical systems, as outlined in the Support Operations Handbook, special-purpose items go through the following life-cycle stages:
1. the definition phase (examination of the concept);
2. demonstration – validation stage;
3. the design and testing stage;
4. the production and deployment phase;
5. operation (operation) and support (maintenance) stage;
6. phase-out stage
A detailed approach to this lifecycle of military goods is presented by Siteanu, E., (2005) who enumerated fifteen stages:
1. analyzing (determining) the necessity of manufacturing a technical product, determining the destination, formulating the functions and establishing the requirements (specification);
2. definition of the technical product and functional analysis, the establishment of the criteria and resources of research, design and development;
3. analysis of probable variants, possible realizations and choosing the optimal ones;
4. preliminary design;
5. design documentation design;
6. detailed design of the product;
7. manufacture of the prototype (functional model);
8. prototype testing and its assessment;
9. preparation of the manufacturing;
10. realization of the zero series, experimentation under the required conditions and approval;
11. serial production and delivery to the beneficiaries;
12. the exploitation of the products to the beneficiaries and the maintenance activities;
13. performing improvement (modernization) activities;
14. removal from service;
15. revitalization (optional).
Litai (Quanzhou) Bags Corp., Ltd. is a professional military-related products manufacturer that provides both OEM and ODM orders. We have an independent overseas warehouse, and the operation mode shifts from a single product manufacturer to provide system integration services, creating a business model innovation. If you have any questions, please contact us via email at daisy@lqtactical.com or phone at 86-15260869531.
Tactical equipment has evolved through the years to keep up with advancements in warfare and technology. The most recent twist in the evolution of this product category is the expansion of tactical gear into the civilian market.
The market's intense competitiveness and the thirst for further tactical gear innovation will ensure that these goods continue to evolve at a rapid rate.
Here is the content list:
1. When did the term tactical gear first appear?
2. Coining of the term “combat shirt”.
3. From cargo pants to combat pants
The term "Tactical Gear" was invented as a marketing tactic to sell surplus military equipment that wasn't labelled as such. This made the gear more appealing to a wider audience, allowing marketers to sell more of it.
This equipment's popularity grew with time. The chances given by this expanding demand were grabbed by top brand suppliers, notably the business 5.11. Meanwhile, specialist forces such as the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation indicated specific tactical gear requirements and needs.
Regular police units quickly adopted variations of items designed for the FBI and others. Tactical equipment was then distributed to first responders and then to civilians. Regular cops, first responders, and citizens now make up a sizable share of tactical gear purchases.
In the early aftermath of 9/11, the United States prepared for another conflict in the Middle East's deserts. The American forces, on the other hand, would be fighting in new clothes and camouflage this time.
Desert Multicam and fire-resistant Nomex battle shirts were standard issues for the US Army in January 2007. In the future, the next generation of battle shirt materials may be ballistic-resistant. Researchers are combining fibres and filaments to produce a material that can withstand low-velocity shots without being penetrated.
The entertainment and music sectors popularized cargo pants. Pantera, as well as urban hip-hop performers, have worn them on stage.
These pants were popular not only because of their practicality but also because of their potential to create a fashion statement. Combat pants, on the other hand, aren't about making fashion statements. It's all about the mission's success.
A soldier upgrade program is known as Objective Force Warrior, one of many similar projects dating back to the 1990s, kicked off the revolution in combat pants.
This work with battle gear, load-bearing, and armour components paved the way for Crye's Modern Soldier System, which included features like integrated knee pads (which can still be found in the company's G3 and G4 combat pants).
Crye controlled the combat pants market for a long time, becoming a favourite among special operations personnel. For many years, it appeared that the market was primarily comprised of Crye combat pants and knockoffs.
That began to alter in 2015 when UF PRO Striker Combat Pants were introduced to primarily European law enforcement organizations.
Litai (Quanzhou) Bags Corp., Ltd. is a professional tactical gear manufacturer that provides both OEM and ODM orders. We have our overseas warehouse, and our business model has shifted from a single product maker to providing system integration services, resulting in a business model innovation. If you have any questions, please contact us via email at daisy@lqtactical.com or phone at 86-15260869531.
The transfer of military weapons and equipment to civilian police has resumed in the first quarter of 2021, following a drop in the last three quarters of 2020 due to a nationwide focus on policing.
According to Stephen Semler, co-founder of the Security Policy Reform Institute, an analysis of data from the Defense Logistics Agency found that the value of military equipment transferred under the 1033 Program reached levels not seen since before former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin killed George Floyd in the first quarter of this year.
Here is the content list:
1. Biden’s policy：the military equipment police have received through the 1033 program.
2. Biden could curtail the program.
3. The military equipment in the 1033 program is on a conditional loan which can be taken back.
“The military equipment police have received through the 1033 program is now Biden’s policy,” Semler wrote in his newsletter. “By him not doing anything about it makes it Biden’s problem.”
Local and state police departments obtain military equipment from the Defense Department for free under the 1033 Program, however, they must cover the costs of transportation and maintenance. According to a memorandum of agreement that the ACLU claims are consistent across all states, the Defense Logistics Agency requires law enforcement agencies to put army equipment received under the 1033 Program into operation within one year and use it for a minimum of a year.
President Barack Obama signed an executive order in 2015 prohibiting the transfer of tracked armoured vehicles, weaponized aircraft, firearms with a calibre of.50 calibre or greater, bayonets, grenade launchers, and camouflage outfits other than woodland and desert designs or plain colours. In 2017, President Trump revoked that presidential order.
According to Semler, one move Biden may take is to recall military gear that has been provided to police and to block further transfers.
“The military gear that flows through 1033 is on a conditional loan, the matériel can be taken back,” Semler wrote. “Biden can order it to be done himself, without Congress.”
Some members of the House of Legislators attempted to stop the program with an amendment in 2014, but it was defeated by representatives who, on average, received more campaign money from PACs and employees of Department of Defense contractors than those who supported it. Because the program authorizes the Defense Logistics Agency to purchase military equipment for the purpose of transferring it to police, it helps Department of Defense contractors. “36 percent of the military equipment transferred under the scheme is brand new,” according to the ACLU's 2014 study.
The National Sheriff's Association, which is funded by telecom corporations such as Verizon Connect and AT&T FirstNet, has also aided police agencies in obtaining military equipment. The National Sheriff's Association wants Congress to formalize the 1033 Military Surplus Program so that presidential orders can't easily limit it.
Litai (Quanzhou) Bags Corp., Ltd. is a professional military-related products manufacturer that provides both OEM and ODM orders. We have an independent overseas warehouse, and the operation mode shifts from a single product manufacturer to provide system integration services, creating a business model innovation. If you have any questions, please contact us via email at daisy@lqtactical.com or phone at 86-15260869531.
