The Improved Outer Tactical Vest (IOTV) is an improved version of the earlier Outer Tactical Vest (OTV) form of the Interceptor Body armour, as fielded by the US Army. The Deltoid and Auxiliary Protector System (DAPS) components, ESAPI (Enhanced Small Arms Protective Insert), Enhanced Side Ballistic Inserts (ESBI), and the OTV's groin protector are all compatible with the IOTV.
Here are the content lists:
1. Why IOTV is better than traditional OTV?
2. What is the background of the improved outer tactical vest?
3. What is the effectiveness of the IOTV?
The OTV design was deemed insufficient and weak in several areas, prompting the creation and deployment of the IOTV. Point Blank Body armour, BAE Systems, KDH Defense Systems, Protective Products Enterprises, UNICOR, and Creative Apparel Associates are actively producing the IOTV. From mid-2007 forward, the IOTV first saw battle with US Army ground combat units, and it is still the basic body armour type deployed by regular US Army ground combat troops overseas.
While the Interceptor Body armour and the Outer Tactical Vest were thought to be fairly effective, others questioned if they were the greatest feasible armour solution for US military forces. The controversy surrounding Dragon Skin, which was created by the now-defunct Pinnacle armour, heightened the argument. Various assertions appeared that Dragon Skin was more successful at shielding soldiers than the then-standard issue Interceptor body armour system, with independent studies and reports appearing to back these claims, prompting various congressional members to request more investigation. In response, the military released public testing results that revealed widespread flaws in the Dragon Skin armour's testing. Dragon Skin was never widely adopted, and several of the Outer Tactical Vest's identified flaws, such as quality of protection and modularity, were rectified in the Improved Outer Tactical Vest and E-SAPI plates.
The Improved Outer Tactical Vest is an advance over earlier US body armour systems, with the Vietnam War-era fragmentation vest limited to fragmentation protection, the PASGT vest limited to pistol bullets, and the prior Outer Tactical Vest unable to stop armour-piercing shots.
The Army has continued to develop the IOTV with additional features in response to troop input on the effectiveness of the armour system, with Generation III including a more intuitive rapid release system and the new Operational Camouflage Pattern (OCP). Body armour conversion kits have been given at a lesser cost to bring earlier Generation armour sets up to newer requirements, rather than constructing fully new IOTV armour sets.
Litai (Quanzhou) Bags Corporation, which is dedicated to strict quality control and thoughtful customer service, our experienced staff members are always available to discuss your requirements and ensure full customer satisfaction. Whether selecting a current product from our catalogue or seeking engineering assistance for your application, you can talk to our customer service center about your sourcing requirements. If you have any needs or questions about the tactical vest, please contact us.
The military term for hiking while carrying weight is "rucking." As you might expect, this is a major concern for the military, as soldiers are required to wear body armour and carry weapons, ammo, water, communications equipment, and other equipment in military backpack when on patrols and operations. For military operations and people, rucking performance and injury prevention are critical.
Many mountain activities, from day hiking to backpacking to major mountain alpinism, require movement over the ground when loaded. We uncovered five rules that are just as applicable to mountain sports as they are to combat operations after analyzing the military's previous studies on the issue.
1.A pound of weight on your feet equals five pounds of weight on your back.
2.An extra pound on your feet means a 5% increase in energy expenditure.
3.Every 1% of your body weight in your pack adds six seconds to your mile time.
According to a 1984 research by the US Army Research Institute, this ancient hiking rule still holds. They looked at how much more energy was expended with different types of footwear (boots and shoes) and found that moving at a given pace takes 4.7 to 6.4 times as much energy when weight is carried on the shoe versus the torso.
In practice, this means you could carry half a gallon of extra water (just over 4 pounds) if you buy a pound lighter pair of boots, which isn't difficult to do; and that's a lot of water. Consider the energy savings of backpacking in light trail running shoes instead of hefty leather backpacking boots throughout a seven-day journey.
Heavier footwear has an impact on you in more ways than one. Heavier boots are stiffer and less responsive. When you strike the ground, your body's stretch reaction is less effective.
However, 5% doesn't seem like a lot, so how does it transfer into run times? So, depending on how long you're running, 5% would slow your mile speed down by 30 seconds. However, the quicker you try to run, the more than 5% will affect your results.
Carrying weight in your pack, on the other hand, isn't free. Each 1% of your body weight carried in your pack adds 6 seconds to your mile time. If you weigh 150 pounds, adding 1.5 pounds to your pack slows you down by 6 seconds every mile. On a long journey, decreasing your pack weight from 40 to 30 pounds saves you 40 seconds per mile for a 150-pound hiker.
Litai (Quanzhou) Bags Corp., Ltd. is a professional military backpack manufacturer that provides both OEM and ODM orders. We have an independent overseas warehouse, and the operation mode shifts from a single product manufacturer to provide system integration services, creating a business model innovation. If you have any questions, please contact us via email at daisy@lqtactical.com or phone at 86-15260869531.
In comparison to civilian products of wide use, military-technical systems are a distinctive category of material commodities whose life is defined by a period of peace of a certain evolution. Following are three main points of the life cycle of a military product:
1. The introduction of the life cycle of a military product.
2. The concept of a military product’s life cycle.
3. The military approach to the life-cycle concept of a product.
The unique properties of military products, their exorbitant price, and their societal utility determine this particular progression of the life cycle. The necessity to cover the security needs that these reinvigorated technical systems can supply under an economically financially beneficial balance is essentially related to the "repeatability" of the life cycle to another beneficiary. These “spiral” lifecycles of military-oriented products are a variation that certain reputable material goods makers have adopted (from the luxury vehicle sector) with great economic results as much as feasible chosen for marketing reasons. Although this approach may not appear to be very advantageous at first glance, it can be a quick and beneficial solution for the second user who can benefit from the capabilities of a reliable and verified technical system that has been upgraded to the current level of global performance in the short and medium-term. This method is ideal for countries with a moderate economic power but significant security needs, such as those imposed by NATO membership, as well as the current complex geopolitical scenario.
Product Life Cycle (PLC) refers to a product's average lifespan and indicates the length of time a product/brand of a product spends on the market, beginning with its introduction and ending with its discontinuation (these two phases can be identified with ease). Many authors compare the concept to biology, where products are born, grow, develop, and eventually get older and die.
According to Rey, Martn-Gil, and Velasco (2004), there are two major conceptions about a product's life cycle. The first (and most common) claim is that a product has four stages in its life cycle:
1. release;
2. the growth;
3. maturity;
4. decline.
According to the American perspective of integrated logistics support for military-technical systems, as outlined in the Support Operations Handbook, special-purpose items go through the following life-cycle stages:
1. the definition phase (examination of the concept);
2. demonstration – validation stage;
3. the design and testing stage;
4. the production and deployment phase;
5. operation (operation) and support (maintenance) stage;
6. phase-out stage
A detailed approach to this lifecycle of military goods is presented by Siteanu, E., (2005) who enumerated fifteen stages:
1. analyzing (determining) the necessity of manufacturing a technical product, determining the destination, formulating the functions and establishing the requirements (specification);
2. definition of the technical product and functional analysis, the establishment of the criteria and resources of research, design and development;
3. analysis of probable variants, possible realizations and choosing the optimal ones;
4. preliminary design;
5. design documentation design;
6. detailed design of the product;
7. manufacture of the prototype (functional model);
8. prototype testing and its assessment;
9. preparation of the manufacturing;
10. realization of the zero series, experimentation under the required conditions and approval;
11. serial production and delivery to the beneficiaries;
12. the exploitation of the products to the beneficiaries and the maintenance activities;
13. performing improvement (modernization) activities;
14. removal from service;
15. revitalization (optional).
Litai (Quanzhou) Bags Corp., Ltd. is a professional military-related products manufacturer that provides both OEM and ODM orders. We have an independent overseas warehouse, and the operation mode shifts from a single product manufacturer to provide system integration services, creating a business model innovation. If you have any questions, please contact us via email at daisy@lqtactical.com or phone at 86-15260869531.
The military tactical vest market has been categorized by type of product, application, and geography in this article. Each segment is thoroughly examined in order to determine the army tactical vest market's potential. Market size, CAGR, industry share, consumption, revenue, and other critical parameters are all examined in depth for each segment.
This study also includes the industry structure, difficulties, company strategies, and industry effectiveness, as well as the military tactical vest market analysis research that covers the market landscape and their growth prospects over the following years. The goal of the military tactical vest market study is to assist both new and established competitors in getting valuable military tactical vest information and making informed decisions.
Here are the main points of this article:
1.What’s the reason for the booming sales of the military tactical vest?
2.The anticipates about global military tactical vest market.
3.What is the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the sales of army tactical vest?
Some factors that fuel the growth of the global army vest market are expanding military modernization programs worldwide (like France's FELIN program and U.K.'s Future Infantry Soldier Technology program), escalating territorial disputes such as in the South China Sea, increasing priority to enhance soldier survivability, increasing investment in technological advancement & product innovation, growing crime rate leading to increasing civilian use, and rising global terrorism. Technological advancements in titanium plating, para-aramid textiles, and nanotechnology will boost the bulletproof vest market, especially the tactical vest market.
During the forecast period, between 2021 and 2027, the worldwide military tactical vest market is expected to grow at a significant rate. The market is likely to develop at a steady rate through 2021, thanks to key players' increasing adoption of tactics.
According to market research firm Technavio, the tactical and outdoor gear industry generates around $1 billion in revenue annually, thanks to rising demand from private security agencies, outdoor leisure, and "a fresh fashion trend." The market is expected to reach $16 billion in yearly sales soon.
Many firms, even industries, have seen salary cuts and job losses as a result of the global epidemic. Covid-19 has posed a danger to the global economy and has had a detrimental influence on a variety of markets. The COVID-19 pandemic is still transforming the growth of numerous industries; nevertheless, the outbreak's immediate impact varies. While some industries may experience a decline in demand, many others will stay unaffected and exhibit strong development prospects. COVID-19 will have a significant impact on the market for military tactical vests.
In conclusion, the overall global military tactical vest market is expected to register significant growth during the forecast period. An increase in military investments and the growing need for technologies that safeguard the lives of military troops are expected to drive market growth during the forecast period. Litai (Quanzhou) Bags Corp., Ltd., established in 2019, is a professional manufacturer engaged in the research, development, production, sale and service of the military backpack, gun bag, tactical vest, hiking backpack and military pouches for 12 years. Don’t hesitate to contact us!
