In comparison to civilian products of wide use, military-technical systems are a distinctive category of material commodities whose life is defined by a period of peace of a certain evolution. Following are three main points of the life cycle of a military product:
1. The introduction of the life cycle of a military product.
2. The concept of a military product’s life cycle.
3. The military approach to the life-cycle concept of a product.
The unique properties of military products, their exorbitant price, and their societal utility determine this particular progression of the life cycle. The necessity to cover the security needs that these reinvigorated technical systems can supply under an economically financially beneficial balance is essentially related to the "repeatability" of the life cycle to another beneficiary. These “spiral” lifecycles of military-oriented products are a variation that certain reputable material goods makers have adopted (from the luxury vehicle sector) with great economic results as much as feasible chosen for marketing reasons. Although this approach may not appear to be very advantageous at first glance, it can be a quick and beneficial solution for the second user who can benefit from the capabilities of a reliable and verified technical system that has been upgraded to the current level of global performance in the short and medium-term. This method is ideal for countries with a moderate economic power but significant security needs, such as those imposed by NATO membership, as well as the current complex geopolitical scenario.
Product Life Cycle (PLC) refers to a product's average lifespan and indicates the length of time a product/brand of a product spends on the market, beginning with its introduction and ending with its discontinuation (these two phases can be identified with ease). Many authors compare the concept to biology, where products are born, grow, develop, and eventually get older and die.
According to Rey, Martn-Gil, and Velasco (2004), there are two major conceptions about a product's life cycle. The first (and most common) claim is that a product has four stages in its life cycle:
1. release;
2. the growth;
3. maturity;
4. decline.
According to the American perspective of integrated logistics support for military-technical systems, as outlined in the Support Operations Handbook, special-purpose items go through the following life-cycle stages:
1. the definition phase (examination of the concept);
2. demonstration – validation stage;
3. the design and testing stage;
4. the production and deployment phase;
5. operation (operation) and support (maintenance) stage;
6. phase-out stage
A detailed approach to this lifecycle of military goods is presented by Siteanu, E., (2005) who enumerated fifteen stages:
1. analyzing (determining) the necessity of manufacturing a technical product, determining the destination, formulating the functions and establishing the requirements (specification);
2. definition of the technical product and functional analysis, the establishment of the criteria and resources of research, design and development;
3. analysis of probable variants, possible realizations and choosing the optimal ones;
4. preliminary design;
5. design documentation design;
6. detailed design of the product;
7. manufacture of the prototype (functional model);
8. prototype testing and its assessment;
9. preparation of the manufacturing;
10. realization of the zero series, experimentation under the required conditions and approval;
11. serial production and delivery to the beneficiaries;
12. the exploitation of the products to the beneficiaries and the maintenance activities;
13. performing improvement (modernization) activities;
14. removal from service;
15. revitalization (optional).
Litai (Quanzhou) Bags Corp., Ltd. is a professional military-related products manufacturer that provides both OEM and ODM orders. We have an independent overseas warehouse, and the operation mode shifts from a single product manufacturer to provide system integration services, creating a business model innovation. If you have any questions, please contact us via email at daisy@lqtactical.com or phone at 86-15260869531.
Everyone agrees that it is necessary to get a rifle bag so let’s look at a brief history of the rifle bag and find out what has changed over the years.
Here are the content lists:
1. It all began in the old west.
2. Today’s Soft Rifle bags.
3. Soft rifle bags offer some distinct advantages.
In the 1830s, the first full-length rifle bags developed, mostly to protect the rifle.
They were sewed across the main seam and ornamented with fringes by American Indians from a single piece of deer or elk hide that covered the entire weapon. Early frontiersmen exchanged for these protective bags because they recognized the importance of their rifles.
While these early bags performed a fine job of securing the rifles, they did nothing to aid Plainsmen in their horseback transit. They were obliged to balance them on the saddle pommel until someone devised a leather sleeve called a horn loop that was fastened to the saddle horn and allowed the rifle to be inserted muzzle down.
The rifle could now travel with the saddle horn, but it had lost much of its protection. The saddle scabbard was not invented until after the Civil War, about 1870, making transit and protection conceivable.
The rifle could be carried with the butt forward thanks to the full-length leather sheath linked to the pommel and the back of the saddle. Anyone who has watched reruns of riflesmoke, Wagon Train, or any other TV western from the 1950s and 1960s has seen a saddle scabbard in some form.
The more things change, the more they stay the same, as someone once said. It's the same with rifle casings. Even if you aren't hunting buffalo on the western plains, you still need the same features in your rifle bag: protection and portability.
Rifle owners are passionate about their firearms and the activities they participate in. They want to be able to attend their favorite events while also ensuring that their prized rifles are safe.
The main advantage of soft rifle bags is that they are lightweight and easy to carry, which is something that every shooting competitor appreciates. For those rainy days on the range, a soft bag's water resistance is another benefit.
One of the knocks on soft bags in the past was that they couldn't secure a rifle as well as a hard bag. Let's face it, you don't want your weapon to move around in its bag. However, there are now twin soft bags with three interior straps, such as ours, that you may customize to keep your weapon secured and secure.
There are also tactical rifle bags that allow you to use barrel and rifle retention methods to secure your rifle's buttstock. Our rifle bag is one of the few on the market with a removable divider that also functions as a rifle mat.
Overall, soft bags have progressed significantly. They give the versatility of zippered compartments to carry ammo, magazines, cleaning equipment, and even storage for your small weapons, in addition to providing more secure transit for your rifle.
A good rifle bag can keep your weapon protected while offering all the convenient features you need. Litai (Quanzhou) Bags Corp., Ltd. is a professional rifle bag manufacturer that provides both OEM and ODM orders. We have an independent overseas warehouse, and the operation mode shifts from a single product manufacturer to provide system integration services, creating a business model innovation. If you have any questions, please contact us via email at choly@lqcompany.com or phone at 86-15260869531.
As part of its effort to upgrade the equipment supplied to its soldiers, the Canadian Army is looking for a new tactical assault vest/load carriage system.
Army officials told Esprit de Corps that a Request for Proposals will be released to the industry sometime this fall.
Here are the content lists:
1.What are the current tactical assault vest design and drawbacks?
2.What’s the bidding document Canadian Army officials will have on the new tactical assault vest?
3.What about the Canadian Army’s results of its testing of a new camouflage pattern?
The current tactical assault vest was developed in the 1990s based on the experiences of the Canadian Armed Forces in the Balkans. That design anticipated soldiers would uniformly carry minimum equipment, however, it is widely known that the present vest is disliked by troops, who often respond by purchasing their similar equipment.
Before departing his role as Director of Soldier Systems for the Canadian Army's Directorate of Land Requirements in July, Lt.-Col. Ray Corby openly admitted that the present vest is no longer enough to suit soldiers' needs. According to Army officials, polls done by Defence Research and Development Canada suggest that the assault vest is at the top of the list of equipment that soldiers want to see replaced. The lack of modularity in the existing vest is cited by the majority of soldiers as the primary source of their dissatisfaction.
According to Canadian Army officials, the Requests for Proposals for the new load-carrying system would be specially worded to stimulate sector inventiveness. The bid package will specify what troops must do, what they must carry, and where they must operate, as well as give industry latitude in determining how new technology might fulfill those responsibilities. The new equipment is planned to be delivered in 2022.
Small amounts of equipment might be acquired at the start, with adjustments made later, according to Corby. “We want to show that as an Army, we can rapidly and efficiently trial and choose equipment so that we can take advantage of industry improvements in the future,” he said. “We are not searching for a solution that will last 20 to 30 years. Every five years or so, we'd want a taste of the greatest for those who need to keep an edge on the battlefield.”
New load carriage system selection trials are slated for next summer, with a cross-section of soldiers from a variety of Canadian Army trades evaluating industry prototypes. According to Army officials, the idea is to create a modular system that will allow soldiers to customize their equipment based on their employment and body type. Aside from modularity, another important issue to consider is "load management," which refers to the total weight of all the equipment a soldier must carry. Overburdening soldiers has the unintended consequence of slowing them down.
The results of the Canadian Army's testing of a new camouflage design, on the other hand, have yet to be released. In September 2019, troops from the 2nd Canadian Mechanized Brigade Group in Petawawa began testing a new disruptive pattern. The soldiers were largely from the 3rd Battalion, Royal Canadian Regiment. The bulk of soldiers wore the “Prototype “J” pattern.
According to the Canadian Army, the trial lasted about six months and finished in February 2020, producing a wealth of relevant data. In addition, Prototype J is still worn by members of the Battalion. Uniforms, a soft field cap, helmet covers, and fragmentation vest covers were supplied to the troops participating in the Prototype J camouflage tests.
Uninhabited aerial vehicles were utilized in some of the tests to assess how far the new pattern could be observed from such drones.
According to the Army, a final decision on the new camouflage will be made no later than 2022. In 2027, the new camouflage uniform will be fully implemented.
Litai (Quanzhou) Bags Corp., Ltd. is a professional tactical assault vest manufacturer that provides both OEM and ODM orders. We have an independent overseas warehouse, and the operation mode shifts from a single product manufacturer to provide system integration services, creating a business model innovation. If you have any questions, please contact us via email at daisy@lqtactical.com or phone at 86-15260869531.
